Talk:Kul Sharif Mosque

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kul Sharif Mosque article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Islam: Mosques Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Mosques task force.

Russia: Visual arts / History / Religion Top‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the visual arts in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the religion in Russia task force.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 11 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Changantonio.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

phony?

i suspect that this article is an elaborate fake, and that the pic has been doctored. anybody agree? SaltyPig 18:24, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Suspect? How about www.google.com? Search, read and then "suspect". --Irpen 19:15, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

i trust you aren't assuming that wasn't done. that would be pretty asinine. SaltyPig 21:05, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article is full of suspect assertions, but the new mosque is not fake. Actually, CIS presidents are meeting today in Kazan, so I have seen the mosque a couple of times in the news. IMHO its look is ugly. --Ghirlandajo 20:21, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ghirlandajo, can you verify the pic's authenticity? it looks more like a computer painting (very good one) than a pic. SaltyPig 21:05, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, check a close-up linked to from within the article. Next, try to google for "Kul Sharif". Here some of the websites I found:

http://kulsharif.rin.ru/eng/mainpage.html

http://www.imam.ru/mecheti.html

http://www.1000kzn.ru/article/ru/944/407/ (

http://www.visitkazan.ru/ru/news/news6.html

http://www.reproflex.ru/Arch-5.htm

http://www.e-islam.ru/kulwarif/ --Ghirlandajo 20:07, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, Ghirlandajo! would love to know what was done to that pic to make it look so computer generated (parts of it anyway), but your spelling cleared up the rest for me. appreciate it. SaltyPig 20:29, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"the largest mosque in Europe" ...

... should be the Süleymaniye in Istanbul, don't you think so? --Magadan ?! 11:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read the article about it: "The Süleymaniye Mosque (Turkish: 'Süleymaniye Camii') is an Ottoman imperial mosque located on the Third Hill of Istanbul, Turkey. It is the second largest mosque in the city, and one of the best-known sights of Istanbul." It's not even the largest in Instanbul, lol. 195.113.149.177 (talk) 07:37, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No sources provided

Some of the article's statements are totally unfounded such as this one "Qolsharif is considered to be one of the most important symbols of Tatar aspiration to independence and liberty.". Either there must have been some sources refering to people or newspapers saying that or it should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.224.188.198 (talk) 08:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All this nonsense doesэt write by Tartars, but stupid foreign Islamists —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.80.170.74 (talk) 20:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other buildings on site?

What buildings were on the site of the Qolsharif Mosque after the original was demolished until the recent replacement was built? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Qolşärif Mosque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090814194536/http://www.russian-mosques.com:80/ShowMosque.aspx?regionCode=TA+&cityName=Kazan&mosqueID=44a33076-df45-4e74-82a2-7913fe0465a6 to http://www.russian-mosques.com/ShowMosque.aspx?regionCode=TA+&cityName=Kazan&mosqueID=44a33076-df45-4e74-82a2-7913fe0465a6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]