Talk:Radhika Gajjala
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
• What you wrote so far is done well. I did not find any spelling errors and the sentences are worded nicely. • It seems she has a good amount of books and journal articles out though. Is there one she is most known for? Perhaps you could highlight one of her pieces. • I noticed you had a question about the journal articles too. My person has an extensive amount as well. I don’t think you have to list them all but I have this same question. • I also noticed the “Fulbright Program” has a Wikipedia page. Perhaps you could link that in the award section. That way it kind of shows how meaningful the award is without you having to explain It. (At least I think it is the same award..) • I also think the journal articles need a DOI. I still have to add these as well to mine. – Overall, it is a good article!
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MHessMN.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]Leah's review: The intro and education sections were done really well. You did a good job sourcing her notoriety in the intro as well.
I would just make sure to follow the outline that Ann provided when it comes to the headings that you use.
I did notice that you are missing one key noteworthy research publication. I would recommend noting the book, Cyberculture and the Subaltern: Weavings of the Virtual and Real, that you mentioned in the intro of the wiki page. I would then give a description of the book, which would give more insight on what your scholar is interested in and what she studies.
I noticed your comment about the number of journal articles you have and I would recommend adding a few more journal articles that relate to her main areas of studies, but after that I would put the link to the page with all of her published journal articles.
I also noticed that you do not have a reference section with all the sources that you used, but you did a good job sourcing the information throughout the paper. I also don’t see your bibliography, which should be at the end of the wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leahrempfert (talk • contribs) 20:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Lots of good comments here! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aburnett412 (talk • contribs) 02:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)