Talk:Rafiuddin Raz

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rafiuddin Raz article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India: Bihar / Literature Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bihar (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I'm improving this article, give me a minute. (For the sake of love 04:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC))

+ Raz is one of the most important poets of Urdu poetry, today. (For the sake of love 06:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rk12m (talk • contribs)

Downgraded class listing after review

Dear Wiki editors, I have taken the liberty of downgrading this-and dont know why we use automatic sinebot type for such subjective categories-- I feel that there is , in fact, quite a lot of work to be done in improving this article, as it has some problems (a) it gives little or nothing of the poet's background and life (b) the language style and grammar usage can be improved considerably (c) basic structure and organisation of the article could do improved too and (d) further references would be useful. I hope that this change will not be construed wrongly, please but in the right spirit, of addding more valuable and higher quality material to really bring this into a B class. Thank you. Khani100 (talk) 21:08, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Khani100[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rafiuddin Raz/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Rated B on the quality scale because:

- All info is referenced. - Needs expansion, but reasonably covers topic. - Has a defined structure. - Has a useful infobox. - Is accessible.

While there are some good points about this article, might I please say that it still needs considerable work, stylistically and in terms of further improvement of refs etc? I would personally not rate it as a B class article, but more in the upper C range, moving towards a B. Thanks

Khani100 (talk) 21:00, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Khani100[reply]

Last edited at 21:00, 30 March 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 03:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)