Talk:Raid of Nassau

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRaid of Nassau has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 8, 2010Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 3, 2012, March 3, 2016, March 3, 2019, March 3, 2022, and March 3, 2023.

Date issue[edit]

Shouldn't "March 1st, 1775" be 1776 (based on the other info in the article)? AnonMoos 21:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanks. Kevin Myers 22:07, March 25, 2006 (UTC)

I've tried to find a reference to "Fort Nassau" and have failed. Could this be referring to Fort Stanley or Fort D'Arcy, or is Fort Nassau no longer in existence?Ealtram (talk) 18:35, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Nassau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quick Edit, May 27, 2016[edit]

Hello, just wanted to let you know that I've copy-edited this article of the Battle of Nassau by removing some commas and improper verb tense. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unholydoom993 (talkcontribs) 03:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference[edit]

Who is "Hand"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamagosh (talkcontribs) 00:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a typo for "Field". Magic♪piano 01:27, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thx. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamagosh (talkcontribs) 01:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dates[edit]

The first sentence and the infobox have dates that do not sync up. Did the raid last 10 days or just 2? howcheng {chat} 08:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The information—about the battle—leads to the conclusion that the direct military clash between the two forces was limited to March 3 and 4. It seems that the dates "March 1–10" had referred to the duration of the entire operation, and not to the battle itself (although the American forces did arrive near Nassau on March 1, they did not depart until "two weeks" had passed, so the March 10 date's provenance is uncertain). I have thus changed the date in the lead sentence of the article, so that it conforms to a more strict interpretation of the meaning of "battle" and I have removed the "contradiction" tag. catsmoke (talk) 08:07, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]