Talk:Red Museum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Red Museum has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star Red Museum is part of the The X-Files (season 2) series, a good topic. It is also part of the Mythology of The X-Files, Volume 1 series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
January 10, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
April 20, 2012 Good topic candidate Promoted
October 3, 2012 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article
WikiProject Television / Episode coverage (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborate effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the episode coverage task force.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject The X-Files (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject The X-Files, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The X-Files franchise on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Anyone know the name of the actor who plays Beth's youngest son Stevie Kane in this episode?

Thanks in advance!

Bianca— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bianca23br (talkcontribs) 01:54, 8 September 2007

"Despite the aforementioned developments of the show's mythological plot arc, there is also more subtly the first explicit reference of a detail that is only finally confirmed (both for the audience and for Mulder) in the last episode of the series - The Truth (I and II) (episodes 9X19/9X20) - seven seasons later."

This needs to say what the "explicit reference of a detail...confirmed in the last episode" is. This sentence is useless without explaining what it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.58.174 (talkcontribs) 16:40, 31 May 2008

I added this under production. They were talking about the colonists plans to arrive in 2012, a date that the Red Museum believed would bring about "The New Age."--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Red Museum 2x10.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Red Museum 2x10.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Red Museum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 23:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Will review soon. Ruby 2010/2013 23:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments[edit]

  • Add wikilinks for characters in plot
  • Not a fan of the image box; the images don't look good side by side, and the formatting doesn't quite fit the box template
  • Identify that Carter is series creator in production section
  • You repeat CBS is the network for Fences twice in the production section; you can just mention CBS the second time (and get rid of the second wikilink)
  • Executive Producer -> Executive producer
  • Identify Wong as a producer (or whatever his title is)
  • mixed-to-negative -> mixed to negative
  • Creative if convoluted -> creative if convoluted
  • "Red Museum' tries..." Is the ' a typo on your part, or the authors?
 Not done Ruby 2010/2013 00:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
  • This link doesn't go where you'd like it to (find a different url?)
  • Italicize and add wikilink to Entertainment Weekly, and add date (ref 4)
 Not done Ruby 2010/2013 00:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Use consistent date formatting (9 December 2011 vs December 9, 2011 for example)
  • Unitalicize Critical Myth (it's a website, not a print source)

On hold for seven days while above comments get addressed. Please respond here when you have finished. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 01:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

OK, I believe I've fixed everything. Tell me how it looks!--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Hate to be a stickler, but the above two still need fixing. Ruby 2010/2013 00:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Whoops! Sorry I missed those. OK, they're all fixed now.--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
No worries! As all comments have been addressed, I am passing this one for GA. Nice work, Ruby 2010/2013 05:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)