Talk:Religion in pre-colonial Philippines
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Multiple issues
[edit]This page still needs a good going over to make sure all the content is reliable. There needs to be copy editing as well to fix grammar and readability. Finally, quite a few of the citations have strangely formatted external links, which needs to be fixed. — GypsyJiver (drop me a line) 14:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
I'm copying my comments over from the talk page of Buddhism in the Philippines:
Inline citations
[edit]I've added a few inline tags to the first two paragraphs of the "Pre-Colonial History" section, indicating how the article needs to be cited. This isn't intended as anything bad, it is just that there needs to be a lot better citing of sources to fulfil Wikipedia:Verification. Feel free to take some of the tags down on the less controversial sentences if you don't want them there. — GypsyJiver (drop me a line) 07:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC). MOVED — GypsyJiver (drop me a line) 14:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Rajah-states
[edit]What is meant exactly by the phrase "Rajah-states"? It comes up in the "Pre-Colonial History" section a lot. Maybe this means Thalassocracy, or maybe it refers specifically to kingdoms, sultanates, or rajahnates mentioned in History of the Philippines? Clarity would be good here, I think. — GypsyJiver (drop me a line) 07:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC). MOVED — GypsyJiver (drop me a line) 14:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Grammar
[edit]I've done some grammar fixing. This article contained a lot of incorrect past participle uses. I have changed most of them to simple past tense. Some phrases like has been and has arrived have been changed to was and arrived. For example, I changed this:
Vajrayana Buddhism has been also known as Tantric Buddhism and Mantrayana, the esoteric teaching, which has been conveyed only by a master to a disciple through initiation or empowerment.
To this:
Vajrayana Buddhism was also known as Tantric Buddhism and Mantrayana, the esoteric teaching, which was conveyed only by a master to a disciple through initiation or empowerment.
There is still a lot of work to do on the content, but at least the grammar is mostly fixed for now. — GypsyJiver (drop me a line) 05:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Updated the article
[edit]I recently improved the article, Some users can also help to improve this article based on the written sources, also i added other religions mentioned in the Philippine history because of the Title it self. WP:NPOV.(JournalmanManila (talk) 02:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC))
Images of Hindu-Buddhist artifacts
[edit]We need to find a images of these Hindu-Buddhist artifacts that mentioned in the Article , Because these images are important for the accuracy of the Article. (JournalmanManila (talk) 09:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC))
Fixed a lot of the grammar
[edit]I went over the whole article and tried to improve the grammar and general tone as much as possible, but some parts I wasn't really sure what to do with, especially towards the bottom of the article. Further improvements are more than welcome. Last edited by: (talk) 21:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Religion in pre-colonial Philippines
[edit]I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Religion in pre-colonial Philippines's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Scott1994":
- From Kingdom of Tondo: Scott, William Henry (1994). Barangay: Sixteenth Century Philippine Culture and Society. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press. ISBN 971-550-135-4.
- From Namayan: Scott, William Henry (1994). Barangay: Sixteenth Century Philippine Culture and Society. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press. ISBN 971-550-135-4.
{{cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help)
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Religion in pre-colonial Philippines
[edit]I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Religion in pre-colonial Philippines's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "garcia2008":
- From Cultural achievements of pre-colonial Philippines: J. Neil C. Garcia (2008). "Precolonial Gender-Crossing and the Babaylan Chronicles". Philippine Gay Culture: Binabae to Bakla, Silahis to MSM. The University of the Philippines Press. ISBN 9789715425773.
- From Babaylan: Garcia, J. Neil C. (2008). "Precolonial Gender-Crossing and the Babaylan Chronicles". Philippine Gay Culture: Binabae to Bakla, Silahis to MSM. The University of the Philippines Press. ISBN 9789715425773.
Reference named "brewer99":
- From Cultural achievements of pre-colonial Philippines: Carolyn Brewer (1999). "Baylan, Asog, Transvestism, and Sodomy: Gender, Sexuality and the Sacred in Early Colonial Philippines". Intersections: Gender, History and Culture in the Asian Context (2): 1.
- From Babaylan: Brewer, Carolyn (1999). "Baylan, Asog, Transvestism, and Sodomy: Gender, Sexuality and the Sacred in Early Colonial Philippines". Intersections: Gender, History and Culture in the Asian Context (2). Archived from the original on 12 Feb 2020.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)