Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (6 participants)
Preston Arsement (2 participants)
Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

European release

Was this game released in Europe? --Mika1h 11:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gamefaqs is your friend, and I don't believe that it was. Cabij 02:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other Games

If anyone has played Little Princess: Maru Oukoku no Ningyou Hime 2 or Tenshi no Present - Marl Oukoku Monogatari, Id appreciate if they started pages on said games. Thanks! Evaunit666 02:10, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I own both of them, plus the other three games. I'll help out as much as I can, but please stop removing the Rhapsody Afar link. It's a huge site with lots of infor on all of the Marl Kingdom games and even related games like Disgaea, La Pucelle, and Phantom Brave.TomitakePrincess 23:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dont get me wrong, its a great site, but it still is a fan site. im not sure of the exact rules right now, so i wont get rid of them now. but posting a link to a fansite (yours?) can be considered advertisement and thus unfit for wikipedia. i certainly encourage you to use your vast knowledge to better the wikipedia articles, though. Evaunit666 00:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When it comes to fansites, it seems a lot of Wikipedians will pull out every rule they can to keep them off, which is not hard, given how many rules this place has. The rule is that you can't post a site that is meant to advertise something, which that site does not. But there are many people who will delete it and revert to whatever excuse they can. Last time I added a site, they went from against the guidelines, to not notable, to copyright infringement. When I pointed out that post of their articles violated technically violate copyright by all the ridiculous things they pointed out, they banned me.@_@TomitakePrincess 06:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wel, no they didn't. You're still posting, aren't you? - Alison ☺ 07:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had to get the ban unblocked. And even after the request was granted another admin prevented me from editting my talk page and blocked my IP. I hate that kind of low behaviour. Anyway, are we all agreed on keeping the link?TomitakePrincess 18:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

its been decided to not have the link. it is considered vandalism. Evaunit666 01:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, that editor went on to be blocked for a number of issues, including linkspamming. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#TomitakePrincess.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29_-_again - Alison ☺ 01:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Come on people, what the matter? Let her have her website linked, it's a small thing and you make a fuss about it. --HanzoHattori 06:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

im sorry, but wow xD i was unaware that so much drama could happen on a few small wikipedia articles. theres a few rules on wikipedia i dont like, but i have to uphold the no fansite thing one. and sorry to anyone that misunderstood what i had previously said; i wasnt giving permission to have the links. Evaunit666 01:14, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you can always close you eyes and not notice. I don't think this was a reason to make anyone feel bad or angry. Look, what kind of game is this one. It's cheerful. This affair is quite sad. --HanzoHattori 23:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

youre right about this being a sad affair, but it certainly didnt have to be. if it was up to me, i wouldnt have blocked her despite her putting words in my mouth and going against the rules, but other people felt she needed to get blocked. its kind of disappointing because she seemed to know a lot about the series and couldve helped the articles a lot O.o Evaunit666 01:21, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy?

I was reading that forum from that link I found in the article's history about the extra content. I havent heard anything else about this, but it's starting to sound like it might develop into a small controversy. I'll keep an eye out for third party sources. Evaunit♥666♥ 20:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

rpg land Evaunit♥666♥ 20:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why isnt what the glitches are specified? Arent they described in any of the sources?Evaunit♥666♥ 13:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, it's more a matter of whether the exact details of the glitches are "notable" or not. And considering we're talking about an issue with the US version of a DS port that only has a tiiiiny blurb there, compared to the rest of the article, I'd say they're not. Heck, even the original title of that DS version (Marl Ōkoku no Ningyō Hime Tenshi ga Kanaderu Ai no Uta, for what it's worth) isn't mentioned there. Anyway, mention the details of the glitches, and I think you might end up doubling the size of that section just for that, on top of sounding like a FAQ from a gaming site... ^^; Erigu (talk) 17:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Rhapsody: A Musical Adventure

European release

Other Games

Controversy?

Categories