Talk:Rhodri Philipps, 4th Viscount St Davids

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 March 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rhodri Philipps, 4th Viscount St Davids/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article is worse than useless, indeed it is misleading. It is not defamatory to describe someone as an undischarged bankrupt and this information is easy to confirm. Equally, if the newspaper articles which were quoted in the earlier reports were defamatory the subject would have sued the newspaper for defamation. He did not. The newspaper quoted was a reputable source.

The way in which you deleted theprevious information shows that you are running scared where living people are concerned, and/or too lazy or too lacking in knowledge to use the simple means available to verify the information given.

The information is very important to anyone who might consider doing business in the future with the subject and by deleting it you are doing the reputation of Wikipedia a grave disservice

Christineminty Christineminty 06:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 01:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 04:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)