Talk:Robert Riddell

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

sorry, i was going to rewrite this. Guinnog 01:03, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Gribbel

I have removed the photo of Gribbel who only has an incidental mention in the article and who's picture certainly shouldn't be given such prominence. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:54, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is certainly more interesting than that dumb gravestone. And anyway, you could simply have decreased the size and put the pic at the bottom next to Griddel's name. But then you do do a lot of editing, so I guess you don't have time. I've solved the problem by giving Gribbel his own page. (Knowing you, you'll probably delete it for lack of noteworthiness.) I can't for the life of me figure out why people find this insignificant page of such interest that the history looks like a constant edit war. Sheesh! Mike Hayes (talk) 09:18, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More interesting is debatable but it's certainly not more relevant. The "edit war" is easy to figure out - someone is trying to replace the current content with a puff piece about a person who doesn't meet WP:N. Thank you for creating the new article although you won't win any points for civility. [1] --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:55, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://digital.nls.uk/robert-burns/manuscripts/glenriddell.html http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=rbsc_pubs. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]