Talk:Romanian Wikipedia

Romania Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Help Romania reach at least GA-status
- Help History of Romania get WP:GOOD
- Request an article or create a missing one
Assess :
- Assess all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for quality
Cleanup :
- Review the Romania-related cleanup listing
- Normalize the use of "Northern Bukovina" (capitalized) and "Northern Bessarabia" (Bessarabian part of Chernivtsi Oblast) all over Wikipedia
Disambiguation :
- Disambiguate project articles and get points
Expand :
- Expand Postage stamps and postal history of Romania
Translate :
- Translate Romania-related articles from the Romanian Wikipedia
- Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages: Projet:Roumanie (in French), Proiect:România (in Romanian), Проект:Румыния (in Russian)
Unreferenced : * Add more reference to FC CFR Timișoara.
Other :
- Make use in articles of the newly contributed images (about 5800!!) from the Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 (WLM Romania external site)
- Review newly created Romania-related articles
- Check the articles needing expert attention or other work, and help with some of the items
- Create Awards for WikiProject Romania
- Contribute photos related to Romania at Commons:WikiProject Romania. Organize Romania related images on Commons. See also media-related tasks

Wikipedia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

This article was nominated for deletion on February 18, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Romanian & Moldovan Wikipedia

Have you already heard about this? Do you think that in that article can be written anything about it? D T G 19:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aromanian Wikipedia

It is true that the Aromanian Wikipedia has never got anywhere. Despite the insistence of the people who wanted it set up that it was going to be a proper Wikipedia, they have created not even fifty pages in two years of existence.

So you do think that it should be mentioned in article about _romanian wikipedia_? D_T_G (P L) 10:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it should be mentioned that the Aromanian Wikipedia was basically trialled on the Romanian Wikipedia first (sort of like an Aromanian test-wiki was set up on ro.wp) and that the idea for the Aromanian Wikipedia came from the Romanian Wikipedia community.

Ronline ✉ 13:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian wikipedia = stubpedia, 10 random article ---> 8 stub, like this: "Melissia este un oraş în Grecia.". Useless, ridiculous. It's a fact, why delete?

Article count

Actually, Romanian Wikipedia is now in 21st position, but it could easily get to 19th. It could also do a lot worse, so maybe we should say it "struggles to be in the first 20" or something... --Venatoreng 08:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Customer profile for trainers tracking device

Tracking device 95.148.61.79 (talk) 22:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]