Talk:Ropsley

Lincolnshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Attractions

Why has this section been deleted? Thanks Dbxlr8r (talk) 19:39, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But the High Street is one of the lowest in the village, peopl need to be aware of this as it is an important and unusual feature of the village. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.31.115 (talk) 12:39, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I remeber this, this was noted in the minutes of the 1997 village meeting, we did decide to change it to 'The Low Street'. But the plans were dumped due to peoples address'es needed changing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by I live for cat cheese (talk • contribs) 19:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.230.90 (talk) 21:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ohai —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.38.26 (talk) 12:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Query

G' day. Mr Keith D, what did you undo of mine? I got a message on my page about something, but I dont know what? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tastyninjasticks (talk • contribs) 20:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I did not undo anything of yours on the article as yet, I dropped you a note to ask you to add references to the material that you are adding to the article so that it can be verified. When you add material then you need to cite the source of the information that you are giving with a reliable source. Keith D (talk) 00:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saxon elements in the church

The link to the National Monuments Register lists elements in the church which point to 10th - 11th century Saxon graves and a carved crucifix. 124.189.9.57 (talk) 09:32, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Ian Ison[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ropsley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716073223/http://www.lincoln.anglican.org/search_parishes.php?14023070 to http://www.lincoln.anglican.org/search_parishes.php?14023070

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]