Talk:SMS Schlesien
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SMS Schlesien article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
SMS Schlesien is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
SMS Schlesien is part of the Battleships of Germany series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 27, 2019. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What happened between 1970 and now?
[edit]The final line of the article remarks that she was still visible as late as 1970, what happened between then and now that she is no longer visible today?Yoenit (talk) 09:23, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- She may still be there; I haven't been able to find anything about the ship post-1970 (Groner's book was originally published in 1966 and updated subsequently by the editors). Parsecboy (talk) 14:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- The German version of this article states, in the final sentence of the ship's history, that still in 1980 there were remnants to be seen, which were "broken off" in the following years. I'm not a native speaker and can't determine whether there's any implication that this breaking off was done by wind and weather, or by people, but the suggestion is that nothing remains to be seen. Laanders (talk) 14:22, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Mixed up
[edit]I changed the Staff references according to what the source actually says. Who ever entered the data simply looked in the wrong column. ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 18:42, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing that. Parsecboy (talk) 18:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
comments
[edit]the table of the armament in 1939 seems to miss the 15-cm guns
I feel that some weapons are called alternatively "40 mm" and "37 mm"
pietro151.29.25.24 (talk) 09:43, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Indeed, the text reads: "Schlesien had six of her 15 cm guns removed to arm the new surface raider Pinguin.[42]", and the article on the Pinguin agrees ([42] is a source discussing the Pinguin, not the Schlesien) , but the armaments table doesn't show any 15 cm guns in either configuration. Most likely they were the 17cm removed in the update. Andyvphil (talk) 07:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia featured articles
- FA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics Battleships of Germany featured content
- High-importance Featured topics articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- FA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- FA-Class Operation Majestic Titan articles
- Operation Majestic Titan articles
- FA-Class Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I) articles
- Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I) articles
- FA-Class military history articles
- FA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- FA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- FA-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- FA-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- FA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Successful requests for military history A-Class review
- FA-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- FA-Class Shipwreck articles
- Low-importance Shipwreck articles