Talk:Saint Kitts and Nevis Olympic Committee

Saint Kitts and Nevis Olympic Committee has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Saint Kitts and Nevis Olympic Committee is part of the Saint Kitts and Nevis at the Olympics series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 27, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed
March 29, 2022	Good topic removal candidate	Demoted
August 8, 2023	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caribbean: Saint Kitts & Nevis Low‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saint Kitts and Nevis (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Saint Kitts and Nevis Olympic Committee/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

1. Prose ✓ Pass

2. Verifiability ✓ Pass

3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass

4. Neutral ✓ Pass

5. Stable ✓ Pass

6. Illustrations ✓ Pass

7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass

Comments

1.

"The committee has oversaw six Olympic and five Commonwealth Games winning one gold medal" - I think there should be a comma between Games and winning
- Done
"The NOC was officially located at the Charles Wilkin Building from 1994 to 2005, when it moved to the Olympic House in Basseterre, Saint Kitts." - It's probably best to mention the city at the first building, instead of the second. I had to read over this a couple times before realizing that the indication was both were in Basseterre
- Done
"The delegate featred one athlete in both" - Spelling error in featured. Additionally, I'm wondering if it should be delegation instead of delegate
- Fixed Delegation makes more sense to me, so I changed it.
Maybe link the 100-metre sprints to 100 metres at the Olympics?
- Not done, it was in the Commonwealth Games. Username⁶⁸⁹² 22:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Was referring to this passage "The delegate featred one athlete in both the men's and women's 100-meter sprints". It's in the Olympics section.

Done

Is there a specific reason the '96, '00, and '16 Olympics are linked, but the '04, '08, and '12 aren't?
- I've Added the links
"The nation has won just one medal at the games, a gold for Kim Collins in the 100 meters.[25] The country has participated in athletics, cycling and table tennis." - Which year was it won in? Probably worth mentioning.
- Added It was in the lead

2.

The Continental Association isn't cited anywhere
- There appears to be no option for citing sources on the infobox template for continental associations. I've started a discussion at the WikiProject. Username⁶⁸⁹² 02:34, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've cited straight to the prose. Probably the best solution. Could potentially be worded differently Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Image licensing looks good. A spot check of the references showed no issues. Placing this one on hold. Hog Farm (talk) 22:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Passing. Hog Farm (talk) 14:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]