Talk:Saint Pantaleon
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commune
[edit]A commune with Saint Pantaléon as its protective patron is not an "other use" in the normal sense. I hope it will be permitted to continue to list the communes here, as well as at the newly-created Saint Pantaleon (disambiguation). The geographical concentration of named communes reflects cult, as always. It's not an irrelevancy really. --Wetman 09:55, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
What about the name ...
[edit]This article is incorrect and misleading in that it is titled "Saint Pantaleon" but the official and canonical name of this historical figure is Saint Panteleimon. The article should redirect to the proper and official name of Panteleimon and not Panteleon. -- Ixthis888 of OrthodoxWiki Thursday, 28 July 2011.
- Pantelejmon ... should it be added? --evrik 14:55, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- The long i is employed only in initial positions-- Iudea-- final positions-- Pamphilij-- or in between other vowels-- Sequoja. This is orthography only, not a "spelling". --Wetman 17:19, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- What does that mean in the context of this photo Image:Icon 01028 Sv. vmch. Pantelejmon Celitel'.jpg --evrik 19:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- "Holy Greatmartyr and Healer Panteleimon." And to amplify Wetman's point, this would be a matter of preferential transliteration. The "i" instead of the "j" is the most common form in English. The "j" might be used in some standard transliterations from Slavic languages. TCC (talk) (contribs) 20:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Plea for expansion
[edit]The article should cover Panteleimon's veneration in Russia in more detail. The origin of the cult: the monastery in Cologne, its ties with Gytha of Wessex, the miraculous healing of her son Harald, whose son Iziaslav II is baptised as Panteleimon, Rossikon is established on Mt. Athos, the churches to his name built in Novgorod and Halych... But perhaps I'm too naive here, considering that Paraskevi is still a stub and Theodore Stratelates not started at all, despite all my campaigning to improve the coverage of Eastern Orthodox saints? --Ghirla -трёп- 10:13, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- We'd help if we could, Ghirlandajo.--Wetman 22:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- It sounds like you know quite a bit. Please help us! Moonbug 08:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Information not covered
[edit]I just picked up a book, Encyclopedia of Saints, 1995, Alpine Fine Arts, ISBN 0-88168-226-8
It has quite a bit of information not covered by this article. I will be adding to it soon. I ask those editors who have a stake in this article and have brought it to this point to be patient with me while I do my best to incorporate the information I have into what has been put up already.
Moonbug 08:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Cadecus
[edit]Isn’t the two serpent stafff used as this saints symbol? I have seen it on the staff of an Orthodox bishop. 77.69.34.203 (talk) 15:53, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Saint Pantaleon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120313232840/http://crch.rbsocc.org/st_pant.html to http://crch.rbsocc.org/st_pant.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Concerning the apparition of Christ
[edit]Although the “Veneration in the East” section states that it “lacks any mention of a visible apparition of Christ,” the hagiography by the Orthodox Church of America clearly says that “the Lord appeared to the saint and strengthened him before his sufferings.” Given there's not a single reference in this section, I'm marking it as dubious. ―Eduardogobi (talk) 02:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- I agree with the marking of the section, but while the Orthodox Church of America doubtless calls itself Orthodox, "in the East" it ain't. Pinkbeast (talk) 13:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)