Talk:Sainthia train collision

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sainthia train collision article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving Sainthia train collision was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 20 July 2010.

Wikipedia

India: West Bengal / Railways Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Trains: in India / Operations Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	April 3, 2019

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian railways.
	This article is supported by the Operations task force.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Renaming article

The current name has missing spaces after the commas. Here is a list of other crashes so we can see how they are named. I suggest renaming this article Sainthia rail collision or Sainthia rail crash (or accident or collision) because other articles name for places, not trains. Plus, Sainthia googles the most hits. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestion is Sainthia rail collision as this is the collision of two trains. I don't like crash, it sounds unencyclopedic. Edgepedia (talk) 06:06, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. "Crash" is so common in lists of accidents, yet, it sounds childish. So, can we just go ahead and make the move? I don't see a lot of folks watching this article who will join in here. Also, the commas without spaces makes it somewhat more urgent. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to be bold and move the article to that name. We know it won't be moved back to the original name because of the comma problem. Other redirects will also probably be created. We can always rename it again without admin assist if we hold off on any redirects. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've renamed the article to replace "rail" with "train"; we usually use the latter term unless the incident arose through actions unrelated to the operation of the train[s] involved. (A recent example is the Castelldefels rail accident, which was caused primarily by the victims' presence in the train's path.) —David Levy 18:41, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. Thank you kindly. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:15, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Woops, must be the heat here. I've done this sort of thing before, so I should know better. This was the collision of two trains, so I agree with the current title. Edgepedia (talk) 05:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External link: Helpline, contact numbers, and email addresses

External link: Helpline, contact numbers, and email addresses:

A bit unorthodox for an encyclopedia, but probably useful for a while. India is very big on Wikipedia, and many will likely use the article's ext link. I hope editors let it stand for a while. I also hope it will remain at the source website for a while. I emailed the site to say so. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not appropriate. This issue has come up many times in disaster articles, and the consensus is always that Wikipedia is not the place for such links. MickMacNee (talk) 15:20, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image needed

Can we get a public domain image from somewhere? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:39, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction

[T]he post mortem of the drivers at the Suri hospital did not show any evidence of drugs…

But then:

Probable causal factors found are the drugging of the drivers…

Does this mean that the post-mortem could have missed the drugs? Valetude (talk) 17:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]