Jump to content

Talk:Sam & Max: Freelance Police

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleSam & Max: Freelance Police is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 22, 2008Good article nomineeListed
February 1, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
February 28, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

who is steve purcell?

[edit]

This article mentions steve purcell working on the game and his contract expiring but doesnt actually say who he is and how he is related...other then having worked on the game.

Nevermind, i have just added links, i didnt check to see if he had his own article before i wrote that last comment.

Bad Brain

[edit]

We never actually found out anything definitive about Bad Brain's "negotiations" with LucasArts. It might be a bit of a stretch saying that they were negotiating at all, maybe it could be mentioned that Bad Brain was also interested.--Wormsie 23:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The citations on this page

[edit]

Is there any chance that the "citations" for claims about waves of angry petitions and other inconsequential nonsense were placed by any person at all besides the owners of the blogs and comic strips that the "citations" point to?Randy Blackamoor (talk) 22:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

E3 trailer

[edit]

The link to the E3 trailer is dead... does anyone have a new one? Would be too bad is it was lost... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.241.50.228 (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a copy of it somewhere on my hard drive. Give me a bit and I'll upload it. Coolgamer (talk) 17:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Its still available on youtube and downloadable on several fansites. However, a direct link to the trailer isn't realy necessary in the article, although I would not be surprised if it was linked to through one of the references. -- Sabre (talk) 19:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Sam & Max: Freelance Police/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Everything is pretty solid. Well done. One thing that I think would be good but not especially urgent is that it should state that it is a cancelled game earlier in the lead. It hints at it but doesn't state directly that it's cancelled until the 2nd paragraph. But it's not a big issue so I'm passing the article. Bill (talk|contribs) 05:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sam & Max: Freelance Police. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source

[edit]