Talk:Sanctuary season 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSanctuary season 1 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 8, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
February 8, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 21, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

American viewers[edit]

Since this is a Canadian TV series, why are the statistics shown for number of American viewers? Is that information not available for Canadian viewers? On a similar note, why is this article written in American English? Spock of Vulcan (talk) 04:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After going through the rest of the article, it seems like maybe this show is actually American, but just set in Canada? If that's the case, it shouldn't say "Canadian science fiction-fantasy television series" in the lead.Spock of Vulcan (talk) 05:43, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Sanctuary (season 1)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll make more copyedits as I go and jot queries below: Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The main story arc taking place during the season involves the Sanctuary working against the Cabal.. - sounds cumbersome, why not just " The main story arc of the season involves the Sanctuary working against the Cabal"
who plot to control all abnormals --> "who seek to control all abnormals"
Fortunately, she exposes the imposter (the creature does not know Magnus hates coffee, a fact of which Will would be aware) and kills it --> "Fortunately" (POV) --> "However"
However, it soon completely takes her over - sounds a bit colloquial to me. a reword'd be good but nothing comes to mind straightaway.
Weathergirl Amy Saunders (Rekha Sharma) and cameraman Zach Pencer..... - it'd be good to note the different style of this episode, and how it is in newsreel footage and from the newsreporter's POV.
I have done addressed the issues, are there any others? -- Matthew RD 21:36, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise looking more polished and on target for GA pass. Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail: Sorry about the delay. Looking alright. Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Thanks for the review. -- Matthew RD 12:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Colour contrast problems[edit]

It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.

To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.

To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.

Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Sanctuary (season 1). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:23, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sanctuary (season 1). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sanctuary_season_1&oldid=1216318459"