Talk:Sankat Mochan Hanuman Temple, Lucknow

Hinduism Mid‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Uttar Pradesh Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Wikipedians in Uttar Pradesh may be able to help!

Lucknow Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lucknow, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lucknow and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LucknowWikipedia:WikiProject LucknowTemplate:WikiProject LucknowLucknow
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the prose of the article has been thoroughly corrected and according to me, it doesn't hold any copyright infringement anymore. I request for a recheck and any suggestions are welcome. --Wikiboy2364 (talk) 08:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the architecture section, which was still copyvio. The rest is okay. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]