Talk:Saraiki literature

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Saraiki literature article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Literature

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Punjab

	Punjab portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punjab, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Punjab on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PunjabWikipedia:WikiProject PunjabTemplate:WikiProject PunjabPunjab-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Correct spelling

Siraiki is from Sindhi word Siro.Therefore correct spelling of Siraiki are Siraiki and not Saraiki or Seraiki.--Rasoolpuri (talk) 17:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rasoolpuri, I am not saying that you are wrong, we need to see a reliable source which uses "Siraiki" over "Seraiki" and "Saraiki". The only reason I used "Saraiki" is that that is the spelling used by the Population Census Organization in the last census. Green Giant (talk) 00:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 'but from begining all famous linguists like Grierson ' Shackle and Wagha etc are using the spelling Siraiki.And no organization has status to change the spelling of any language--Rasoolpuri (talk) 11:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page contains very false statements,like "saraiki is spoken by 120 million people in the world".Saraki is spoken by 30 million people in Pakistan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.118.2 (talk) 19:40, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:20, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]