Talk:Saskatchewan Highway 16

Saskatchewan Highway 16 was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 11, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
March 1, 2024	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Canada Roads: Trans-Canada Highway / Saskatchewan Top‑importance

This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Trans-Canada Highway
	Saskatchewan

This article has been identified as having the following issues:
/
	This article has been flagged for assessment.
	This article may or may not contain a map. Please check, then add "needs-map=" to this template accordingly.
	This article has a KML file.

Canada: Saskatchewan Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.

Route Description

The route description was entered chronologically by date of improvements and settlement establishment. SriMesh | talk 01:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Murders?

Has anyone got any info on all the unsolved murders that have alledgedly taken place on this route? Morbid fascination prompts me to enquire! 19:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.217.24 (talk)

Good article review

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

This article is in need of two changes. The first is a massive replacement of red links. There are way too many to pass at this time. The second thing is the USRD/Canada Roads WikiProject compliant junction list is not used here, and this chart is too dang large. An example of it would be Saskatchewan Highway 913, where it is used correctly. I've put this article on hold. This is easy, just fix those two problems. ^Mitch 32 ^contribs 16:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am puttering away at creating community and rural municipality articles to reduce red links. The USRD/Canada Roads WikiProject compliant junction list is used, as I did copy it from Saskatchewan Highway 913 so things would become consistent. The only thing I did differently was to stuff in the Template:Km to mi as when the highway was started, Canada was using miles, and then in the 1970's Canada roadways all changed to metric, and now everything is in kilometers. So thought it would be handy to have both miles for the US visitors who still use miles, and kilometers for the CA visitors who now use Kms. Don't know what to do about the silly chart length. I only mentioned major intersections and concurrencies and not all the little intersections with township and range grid roads. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 01:33, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very sorry for the late reply. However, I'm gonna pass this article, but I do suggest it get a good copyedit and a good peer review.^Mitch 32 ^contribs 18:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History

This feature article Ridge Route has an history section - from pre history to current status. SriMesh | talk 19:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article goes into quite a digression about the city of Lloydminster. The link to the Lloydminster article should be adequate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Demogaffe (talk • contribs) 15:53, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect image

The image used to represent the cloverleaf interchange at Saskatoon does not accurately represent it, as the interchange has a different configuration than that shown in the generic image. Is there not an aerial image of the actual structure available? 50.66.121.20 (talk) 04:02, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Saskatchewan Highway 16

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This 2008 listing contains significant uncited material, meaning it does not meet GA criterion 2b). It also contains extensive quoting of copyrighted material, which for me goes beyond WP:LIMITED and violates criterion 2d). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.