Talk:Scott Robinson (Neighbours)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Australia: Television Low‑importance

	Australia portal Scott Robinson (Neighbours) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Merge proposal

Proposing to merge Scott Robinson and Charlene Mitchell to this article primarily, with perhaps some aspects also merging into Charlene Robinson (although I've yet to find anything more pertinent to Charlene that doesn't already exist on that article). With Scott's article not as developed as it could be, the additional material in this third article would be better served to improve the primary article rather than existing in a third article space that is less likely to be linked to, and subject to fall behind when that characters return this year. U-Mos (talk) 23:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full disclosure: Afd discussion from February 2020, which focused on the subject's notability. A merge proposal does not dispute the notability of the couple, or suggest the removal of any material. U-Mos (talk) 23:18, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I'm not sure this is the right way to go about expanding Scott's article to match Charlene's. There is actual info just about him and his storylines out there, it's just a matter of researching and time. I know I've got a bunch of stuff, and I actually just typed up some great info from a Darius Perkins interview to add. Scott Robinson and Charlene Mitchell is about the history of how the couple came to be and their impact. I made sure the info was relevant to them together based on other soap supercouples. Also, I'm not sure how it will fall behind? It just needs to be updated with their return. - JuneGloom07 Talk 01:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Of course more than just the material from this article would be needed to expand the Scott article, that's not in question. This seems like a very WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, as to be honest from a click through of some other supercouple arguments I can't see anything worth imitating. The only reason I could see for a third article existing for a soap couple would be if the individual character articles were both at capacity length. That's not the case here. U-Mos (talk) 07:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. As per June. Granted Scott's article needs work but Wikipedia is a work in progress and therefore so are the articles on it. Scott's article will be filled out more and eventually match Charlenes. The couples article will updated when they actually return 5 albert square (talk) 10:22, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I believe that this article has great potential beyond it's current state. It just needs the work putting into it. I think as a supercouple there are countless sources and information that could expand this article. It would end up being overly long for a development section. I think a concise section in the development with would fit either article with a link to this article when complete. I think the AFD comments reflected that Scott and Charlene were more than just another supercouple. As one editor stated, they were the supercouple. I know you do not dispute that. Do you think you might reconsider if the supercouple article is improved and Scott's article is expanded with information aside from Charlene?Rain the 1 20:39, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've expanded the article and didn't need to pick apart the S and C one to do it, so this discussion is probably moot now. - JuneGloom07 Talk 02:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per all the reasons listed above DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 08:59, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I do honestly find all "powercouple" articles useless (like Scott Robinson and Charlene Mitchell), but this article has now been expanded by User:JuneGloom07, so I think we are good. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 20:03, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]