Talk:Scriptural Way of the Cross

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism Mid‑importance

Scriptural Way of the Cross is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Added back in related New Way of the Cross

The Philippines has adopted a third form of the Scriptural Way of the Cross, called the New Way of the Cross, at about the same time as the Scriptural Way. The two have many similarities and in fact many confuse them. Many in the Philippines call the New Way the Scriptural Way. Seeing as the Philippines has the largest English-speaking Catholic population in the world, I think that the Philippine practice should be mentioned in this article so that people understand that there is a difference between JPII's Scriptural Way and the Philippine New Way. I have therefore added it back in. What I have been looking for, and have been unable to find, is any reliable third party source that discusses the history and the rationale behind the New Way. Ideally there would be a section discussing the differences but we cannot add that until we have sources. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 13:06, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Iloilo Wanderer: The correct way to differentiate is through a hatnote. Daask (talk) 01:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New way of the cross is from the CDF

The claim that the new way of the cross is not approved by the Vatican is not true. The origin of that is from a letter from the CDF to a Philippine Bishop detailing what stations it should include. Unfortunately, I'm unable to track the letter, but it is also not right to make claims without appropriate sources. Ericglm.4 (talk) 06:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]