Talk:Serna
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 10 April 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: withdrawn. See my comments below. -- Tavix (talk) 00:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
– I don't think there's a primary topic here (and if there is, it'd be the surname). While my external search for "Serna" primarily show people, a page view analysis shows that the Nepalese municipality gets the most views, but only by a little bit (probably because it has the base title). -- Tavix (talk) 16:10, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. There's no article about the surname, just a list of partial title matches. Instead, delete the DAB page per WP:TWODABS and put a hatnote on the village page directing readers to the surname list. This will save readers the most clicks. — AjaxSmack 21:07, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support first move. Merge the disambiguation page together with La Serna and de la Serna instead, and redirect "Serna" to La Serna -- 70.51.45.100 (talk) 03:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- This isn't the place to make merge requests. Please stay on topic. -- Tavix (talk) 04:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- This is a discussion on what is to be done with "Serna", which would be to redirect it to La Serna. So it is on topic. If you have no objections, I'll merge them right now, but as it affects this move req, I thought a heads up is good. Since you think it doesn't matter, I could just do it now instead, which would make the move request moot. -- 70.51.45.100 (talk) 02:16, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- No, this is a move request to move Serna to Serna, Nepal and Serna (disambiguation) to Serna. La Serna has nothing to do with this. Please don't hijack this request with silly merge proposals. if you want to make a merge request, you may do so at WP:PM. -- Tavix (talk) 02:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Why do you consider the merger to be "silly"? "La Serna" and "Serna" are the same except for an 'article' (like "the" in English) separating them. Similarly with "de la Serna"; so would be best if they were all one page. -- 70.51.45.100 (talk) 03:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Because that wouldn't be helpful for our readers. If someone is searching for "La Serna", they'd be looking for one of the entries at that dab. By merging them, it'd be mixed in with things that aren't "La Serna" and it'd be harder for someone to find what they're looking for. -- Tavix (talk) 03:44, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- That being said, I do partially support your merge proposal over the status quo. In fact, I'm going to withdraw this and enact it as that would satisfy everyone here to an extent. -- Tavix (talk) 00:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Because that wouldn't be helpful for our readers. If someone is searching for "La Serna", they'd be looking for one of the entries at that dab. By merging them, it'd be mixed in with things that aren't "La Serna" and it'd be harder for someone to find what they're looking for. -- Tavix (talk) 03:44, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Why do you consider the merger to be "silly"? "La Serna" and "Serna" are the same except for an 'article' (like "the" in English) separating them. Similarly with "de la Serna"; so would be best if they were all one page. -- 70.51.45.100 (talk) 03:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- No, this is a move request to move Serna to Serna, Nepal and Serna (disambiguation) to Serna. La Serna has nothing to do with this. Please don't hijack this request with silly merge proposals. if you want to make a merge request, you may do so at WP:PM. -- Tavix (talk) 02:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- This is a discussion on what is to be done with "Serna", which would be to redirect it to La Serna. So it is on topic. If you have no objections, I'll merge them right now, but as it affects this move req, I thought a heads up is good. Since you think it doesn't matter, I could just do it now instead, which would make the move request moot. -- 70.51.45.100 (talk) 02:16, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- This isn't the place to make merge requests. Please stay on topic. -- Tavix (talk) 04:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose. I support AjaxSmack.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.