Talk:Simple

WP:MOSDAB

This page is incredibly non-standard—disambiguation pages are supposed to be simple lists of links, with a bit of explanatory material. —johndburger 01:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted a huge chunk of material, but as far as I can tell, not a bit of it had anything to do with a Wikipedia page that someone might be looking for with "simple". There's already a link to Wiktionary. —johndburger 02:30, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Simon

What about Simple Simon (who met a pie man)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.254.68.36 (talk) 14:03, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SIMPLE (Standard Interface for Military Platform Link Evaluation)

This is a military messaging protocol defined in STANAG 5602. Refer to Link 16, J-Series messages and Tactical Data Links (TDLs or TADILs). Should be dis-ambiguated from the SIP-based SIMPLE messaging protocol. Note also users may search for lower case (simple) as well as upper case (SIMPLE). Should also be an article for this military protocol?

Requested move 17 December 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus that there is a primary topic for this simple term. SIMPLE was merged to here. Alas, consensus on this matter has not been easy to achieve. It's not that simple. – wbm1058 (talk) 14:05, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Simple → Simple (disambiguation) – "Simple" should be a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Simplicity as the broad concept article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:14, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The dab at SIMPLE overlaps in content with this one (there is even an entry labeled "SIMPLE" here that does not appear there), and should be merged with this whatever the result. Dekimasuよ! 16:26, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Hyperbolick (talk) 13:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:NOTDICT. No evidence is given that encyclopedia readers typing "Simple" are searching for a glorified WP:DICDEF on simplicity, when there are quite a large number of actual encyclopedic topics on the Simple DAB page. I agree that SIMPLE should have been merged, though. — AjaxSmack 16:37, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, pending more evidence that Simplicity is the PRIMARYTOPIC. Being the origin or namesake of all the other terms on a dab does not necessarily mean a topic is primary; Harald Bluetooth doesn't get precedence over Bluetooth. MOS:DABORDER #2 provides for keeping Simplicity at the top of the dab, but that's a lower bar. —swpb^{T • go beyond • bad idea} 17:01, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.