Jump to content

Talk:Socialist Party (Portugal)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Fair use rationale for Image:Psazores.jpg

[edit]

Image:Psazores.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop the Portuguese Socialist Party redirect

[edit]

The Portuguese Socialist Party (PSP) existed from the late 19th century to 1931 (the Estado Novo outlawed it). The current party is only called Partido Socialista (PS) because it is unrelated to the other PSP and between the creation of the PSP and the creation of the current PS, a Public Safety Police (Polícia de Segurança Pública, PSP) had apeared, and to stop any misunderstanding they never had the word Português in the name or the acronym PSP. As such the redirect page should stop, and instead in Portuguese Socialist Party someone should write a translation of the Portuguese wikipedia article on the PSP party. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.154.141.187 (talk) 19:26, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What does the party stand for exactly?

[edit]

Is it socialist, democratic socialist, social democratic, third-way? I am confused to this so I would like to see more detail, thanks. Dunnbrian9 (talk) 04:32, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm portuguese, and it's actually pretty confusing to me too. The party says it belongs to the left wing, but when they are in the government, the only left wing policies they implement are social ones (gay marriage for example). But they also lower salaries, and do all sorts of crazy right wing stuff too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.83.65.143 (talk) 16:57, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it stands for social democracy, but I also read "third way" in infobox. I have doubts about being third way, that should be confirmed by citing reliable sources. B.Lameira (talk) 20:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, like in the French Socialist Party, there are two main factions, a social democratic and a democratic socialist. – B.Lameira (talk) 12:46, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 21:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect from Jorge Campinos

[edit]

Hello everyone! The SuggestBot offered me to produce some wikilinks to Jorge Campinos (politician), and I found out that this page about the Socialist Party is actually a redirect from "Jorge Campinos" if you search for articles on him. I ran a keyword search for "Campinos" through this article, and there are no mentions of him in the text. I am very new here and I am still trying to understand the local rules of notability and what not, but is this situation normal? Just wondering. Ignat.Lolov (talk) 16:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]