Talk:Sodium triphosphate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Food and drink (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 
WikiProject Chemicals (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Title-lede inconsistency[edit]

Is there a chemistry-related reason why the initial reference in the lede doesn't match the article title? I propose changing the current:
Sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP, sometimes STP or sodium triphosphate ...
to the less incongruous:
Sodium triphosphate (STP, sometimes STPP or sodium tripolyphosphate...
Any objections? --lizardo_tx (talk) 04:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I've made this edit. --lizardo_tx (talk) 14:12, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Environmental effects[edit]

The section on "Environmental effects", as well as being poorly written, seems disingenuous. It spends a lot of words on the (uncited) claim that STPP isn't poisonous, but that's not really the issue of concern with this substance. The issue is that it's an inorganic phosphate, and (like other inorganic phosphates) it's a nutrient (not a poison) to organisms like plankton. Think "phosphate fertilizer." Phosphates contribute to blooms that deplete other nutrients and mess up the food chain, as in the Gulf of Mexico dead zone. Anyone care to write some more-balanced text on the environmental issues surrounding STPP? 69.63.59.137 02:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

I found some info from the Danish EPA and put it in. So we now have some balanced, sourced environmental info. Fanra (talk) 01:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

The article states that "As STPP is an inorganic substance, biodegradation studies are not applicable." This is incorrect, as biological organisms are capable of 'degrading' (i.e. using) many inorganic substances. As mentioned by 69.63.59.137 above, STPP may even be a food source. --66.92.171.249 (talk) 03:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 17:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Info about the chemical used for baked beans....[edit]

--222.64.218.196 (talk) 04:59, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

--222.64.218.196 (talk) 05:11, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

--222.64.218.196 (talk) 05:13, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Why not natural preservatives...???[edit]

--222.64.218.196 (talk) 05:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

More info about the chemical from Google scholar....[edit]

--222.64.218.196 (talk) 05:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

--222.64.218.196 (talk) 05:08, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Wrong target for the link to HERA[edit]

Presently the HERA link lands at Hadron-Electron Ring Accelerator which is very misleading. The right target should be House and Environmental Risk Assessment on Ingredients of Household Cleaning Products, an article which does not yet exist in en.WP. I suggest such an article to be created. See Guidance Document Methodology for an introduction: [1]
82.182.149.179 (talk) 04:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)