Talk:Solitude Palace

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's "European 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out!

Castle/Palace

Since the article says that it's not a castle at all but a palace, and it's not a defensive structure, and the architecture doesn't try to imitate a castle, I vote for moving the article to Solitude Palace.--Sitacuisses (talk) 15:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Understand your concern, but consider palaces in the UK like Castle Howard. As Solitude Castle now seems to be the established norm I would suggest it remains as is. See also the Stuttgart official site, which, though not necessarily a jewel of English literature, uses "castle" more than palace. Maybe change it to "Castle Solitude"? BuzzWoof (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At the Schloss Solitude official website here, the English-language version refers to Schloss Solitude as Solitude Palace, so the article should probably be changed to that name, if others agree. -- Blairall (talk) 05:17, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Castle Solitude. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130426053736/http://www.mediaculture-online.de/fileadmin/bibliothek/schwarz_juergen_schiller/schwarz_schiller.html to http://www.mediaculture-online.de/fileadmin/bibliothek/schwarz_juergen_schiller/schwarz_schiller.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]