Talk:South railway line, Sydney
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
== Incorrect statement
Untitled
[edit]What is marketed by CityRail as the 'South Line' branches from the Main Western Line at Granville. A flyover carries the 'down' (southbound) line over the 'Y Link' tracks (which carry the Cumberland Line services) between Merrylands and Harris Park. The line proceeds south through Merrylands, Guildford and Yennora stations which all have side platforms
The southbound line out of Granville towards Merrylands does not go over the flyover. Eregli bob 08:27, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
South Line discrepancies
[edit]I have added Newtown, Croydon and Homebush stations to this list, since they are indicated as being on the South Line on all revised network maps (as of the new timetable introduction in September 2005.
However, on consulting the timetable booklet (Inner West/South/Cumberland, September 4, 2005) I can see a number of discrepancies:
- Some trains which go through Granville which by definition must be on the South line, stop at stations not indicated as being on the South line. For example, the 4:53am (dep. Granville) weekday service is an all-stops service with the exception of Clyde.
- Non-all-stops lines regularly stop at Summer Hill, which is not considered to be on the South line, e.g. the 2:49pm (dep. Canley Vale) weekday service.
Am I missing something here on the nature of Cityrail lines to be this informal and flexible?
I hesitate to any more updating to the South line based on this.
As a side note, the aforementioned timetable booklet (Inner West/South/Cumberland) actually doesn't contain any timetable information for the Cumberland line!
Gregwmay 03:09, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Cityrail considers the South and Inner West lines to be one operational unit, they are both in so-called Sector 2 and they share a timetable booklet. Also, prior to 2000, the section Cabramatta- Lidcome of the Inner West line was considered part of the South line, and was accordingly colour-coded green (the former South line colour), when they were colectively known as the Macarthur Line. Quaidy 05:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Merge with Main Suburban Line page
[edit]There is no point in having duplication of page information. The Main Suburban railway line, Sydney page should not exist and the information should be held here or at the Inner West Line page. We don't have duplication for apparent technical names of railway lines elsewhere. Let's stick to the names given to the CityRail lines and keep the information on that. JROBBO 22:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- The trouble with that is where should it go- South, Inner West, North, or Main West lines? What Cityrail calls its lines are current marketing terms and sometimes bear little reference to the actual line names. If we write everthing according to what CityRail currently markets itself as, a lot of these pages will look like they have been written by CityRail's PR department (and a lot of then do!) and not encylopedic entries. Anyway, the Main Suburban Line page is properly referenced, which is more than I can say for most of the other pages that fall into the CityRail topic. Quaidy 00:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- The information is easily covered under the Inner West Line article - all the trains stop on the supposed "Main Suburban Line" stations. The reason the articles are not referenced is because they were written before much emphasis was put on referencing; and I haven't had time to do all of them. The note about the CityRail PR department is utter rubbish and does not contribute anything to this discussion. Let's stop this nonsense in doubling up and merge it into the Inner West article, or South article. JROBBO 04:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- The trouble with that is where should it go- South, Inner West, North, or Main West lines? What Cityrail calls its lines are current marketing terms and sometimes bear little reference to the actual line names. If we write everthing according to what CityRail currently markets itself as, a lot of these pages will look like they have been written by CityRail's PR department (and a lot of then do!) and not encylopedic entries. Anyway, the Main Suburban Line page is properly referenced, which is more than I can say for most of the other pages that fall into the CityRail topic. Quaidy 00:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Stations table
[edit]I think that the large station table on this and other Cityrail pages is too big and directory like for an encyclopaedia page. Would anyone read it? It seems a rehash of information that could easily be found on the official Cityrail website. Thoughts (with civility please)? Endarrt 01:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Northern railway line, Sydney which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 13:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
File:South, Inner West and Cumblerland lines timetable 2010 cityrail.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:South, Inner West and Cumblerland lines timetable 2010 cityrail.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
| |
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
- WikiProject Disambiguation pages
- Disambig-Class Australia articles
- NA-importance Australia articles
- Disambig-Class Sydney articles
- NA-importance Sydney articles
- WikiProject Sydney articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Disambig-Class rail transport articles
- NA-importance rail transport articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages