Talk:Sporcle

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Internet culture Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Sporcle received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Kyrgyzstan

The biggest running joke on Sporcle, especially in geography quizzes, is about the country of Kyrgyzstan. Probably no reliable source reports it though.--X sprainpraxisL (talk) 23:27, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia on Sporcle

It might be interesting to include Wikipedia appearances on Sporcle; however, I do not know if it would be notable. Any comments?Ryan Vesey (talk) 01:12, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

do we need this article?

Is the Sporcle website famous enough to warrant there being an article about it here? What does anybody else here think? --Money money tickle parsnip (talk) 16:37, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to have enough sources to meet WP:WEB. --McGeddon (talk) 14:58, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are largely links to Sporcle itself. There is little in the way of secondary sources of importance. I strongly suspect that the reason for this article's existence is mainly because the Sporcle website happens to appeal personally to a lot of the same kind of people who like to edit Wikipedia. There is little sign that it has any real importance beyond that, and I would suggest removing it. --Money money tickle parsnip (talk) 21:12, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should keep it. It recently charted the top 1000 on Alexa's list. 1618033golden_c0ntr1b5 23:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

I could swear Sporcle used to have a different name. Can anyone else recall this? Or was there just a very very similar website at some point? --Ifrit (Talk) 15:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm pretty sure it's always been Sporcle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corndog234 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction isn't written very well at all

Someone who writes better than I should change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WiKaffiN (talk • contribs) 23:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sporcle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120527060151/http://omaha.com/article/20090615/LIVING/706159982 to http://omaha.com/article/20090615/LIVING/706159982

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update Presidents quiz screenshot?

Should I get a new, updated screenshot (showing 45 presidents and that Obama's term ended), or leave it as it is? The choice of quiz is probably the best option. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jelroy the second (talk • contribs) 19:01, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that can be a 'friendly' edit. The question of whether that graphic is the most suitable choice is more interesting. I would pick a 'timeless, high-played' quiz with an eye-catching (as opposed to an eye-straining) graphic. I'd pick from either Sports or Geography, since those are referenced as the most common. Wigbold (talk) 18:35, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wigbold and Jelroy the second: I'd encourage you to be bold and do it! As a non-free file, it will need uploading locally on Wikipedia through the Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard process. Let me know if you need help with this. — Bilorv (talk) 23:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]