Talk:Sportsnet 360

Canada: Sport / Television Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Introduction

Sports Scope launched earlier than 1994. I don't know the original launch date but this channel was on Western Coaxial Cable in Hamilton as early as Spring 1993. bigoranget 16:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Merge

Disagree -- I don't think there is any need to merge the two articles, the guy is just a personality of the network, he needs his own article seperate from the network. 69.198.108.51 21:03, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the proposed merge; it doesn't seem that there is much to say about the guy that isn't directly related to his job. Jlittlet 02:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly disagree with the proposed move of James Sharmen to be syndicated with The Score's article because he has his own show, he is very interesting, and he had way more information than Steve Kouleas who has his own article.

Fair use rationale for Image:Headlinesports cdn.jpg

Image:Headlinesports cdn.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sportsnet 360. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20141011084555/http://sports.nationalpost.com/2014/10/09/rogers-sportsnet-draws-fewer-viewers-to-nhl-opening-night-than-cbc-still-sets-network-record/ to http://sports.nationalpost.com/2014/10/09/rogers-sportsnet-draws-fewer-viewers-to-nhl-opening-night-than-cbc-still-sets-network-record/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]