Jump to content

Talk:Stacy X

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit

[edit]

Corrected the numerous spelling mistakes. Also corrected a passage that stated Stacy X used her powers to try to seduce Nightcrawler. This never happened. While she may have made sexual overtures to several X-Men, she never attempted to do so with the use of her powers.

Xtremesage 05:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stacy X in X-Men 3

[edit]

Whomever Omahyra Mota is playing in X-Men 3, it's not Stacy X. From writer Simon Kinberg's Q&A thread over at Xverse:

"What's the favourite X3 rumour you've read on the internet so far?"

"Wow, so many to choose from. I was pretty amused by the latest “film review” of a movie that hasn’t even been cut together. I also followed all the crazy Stacy X rumors. At the end of the day, Stacy X isn’t even in the movie!" 71.52.217.185 20:37, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for improvement

[edit]

1) Add in a lot more about the Mutant Ranch battle. And especially her first 'meeting' with Iceman.

2) Add in more about her heroics, such as when she gave the X-Men first aid during the battle with Black Tom.

3) The chronology is all sorts of wacky.

4) I thought Stacy stopped the sex for money after joining the X-Men. And I could have sworn Stacy never actually -did- sex for money. Using her powers to make men happy, sure, but never actual sex.

5) The weirdo rivalry with Husk should be put in.

Lots42 09:48, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aliases

[edit]

Wasn't she once known as (the new) Angel? Luis Dantas (talk) 08:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You must be thinking of Angel Salvadore, another new female character introduced in New X-Men around the same time Stacy X was introduced in Uncanny X-Men. -- AvatarMN (talk) 18:41, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate Nullifier, the character

[edit]

There needs to be a footnote stating that it's the character named Ultimate Nullifier, not the weapon. I had never heard of the character before looking it up, and at first thought that this was a mistake.   — TARDIS builder     ★       07:53, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]