Jump to content

Talk:Steak n Shake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vandalism

[edit]

This page was subject to vandalism, and I'm doing my best to fix it. This is not the first time--I recommend that it be locked, or at least only open for editing by registered users. DukeOfSquirrels 08:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism is very common for all wikipedia articles, unfortunately. I don't recommend that it be locked, just that those of us who are good wikipedians check it every now and then for incorrect statements and simply remove them. WiiAlbanyGirl 17:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

King Cola?

[edit]

Am I imagining this, or did Steak & Shake once have their own brand of cola called King Cola? --Smart Mark Greene 05:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Discussion of King Cola at Steak 'n Shake

Mr. Kelly, a major share holder of Steak 'n Shake, was also a major share holder of King Cola. It was too bad that the customers didn't like King Cola. SNS moved on to Pepsi... and then Coke. --FA71494C 22:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well coke is clearly the best option of those three is it not?

Not really an ad

[edit]

It's a page that happens to talk about one of my favourite places, and it describes the locations pretty well. I don't think it's an advertisement at all.

I definitely agree. Looking through the history the tag seems to not have merit. I am taking it down.Rtrev 18:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is the link to order the chili by mail? M8gen 05:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While this article may not be written like an advertisement, it is poorly written. I'd really like to combine the Uniforms, Building appearance, etc. sections into one section for Restaurant Ambiance. The proper way to write a wikipedia article is one major title with minor titles under it, not numerous major titles. Any objections? WiiAlbanyGirl 20:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article had absolutely atrocious grammar (One sentence for a paragraph, unnecessary bullets, beginning sentences with a conjunction, misspellings, etc.). It was informative, but so poorly written that it made the reader lose interest quickly. I condensed the article, created proper sections, and created proper delineated timelines were necessary. While I did not overhaul the entire article, it's a LOT better than what it was. TY, and enjoy! WiiAlbanyGirl 21:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]