Talk:Steam tug Brent

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

More information:
/
	This article lacks a ship infobox. You can help by adding {{Infobox ship begin}} to the article and filling in the information. A usage guide is available. Do not place a blank infobox template into the article.

England

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Steam tug Brent appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 September 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in the late 1940s the steam tug Brent removed war-related debris, including naval mines, from the River Thames?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Steam tug Brent.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Sohom Datta talk 06:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Brent in 2010

... that in the late 1940s the steam tug Brent (pictured) removed war-related debris, including naval mines, from the River Thames?

Source: "Brent (1945), seen searching the Thames for mines and other wartime debris in the late 1940s, was originally the prefabricated tug TID 159." from: Robins, Nick (30 August 2017). Wartime Standard Ships. Casemate Publishers. p. 445. ISBN 978-1-84832-378-0.

ALT1: ... that the steam tug Brent (pictured) was, for more than 20 years, a private yacht? Source: "BRENT was saved for preservation by Ron and Janet Hall in 1971. She was successfully used as a floating home and tug yacht, with minimal alteration to her original fabric, but some changes made to allow for living on board. The engine room and machinery are still entirely as original. For some 25 years she sailed round Thames and East Coast waters and twice went as far as the Netherlands. Due to concerns about her boiler, she was laid up in 1994." from: "Brent". National Historic Ships. Retrieved 15 August 2024.
ALT2: ... that the steam tug Brent (pictured) towed fireworks barges for celebrations of the coronation of Elizabeth II? Source: "In 1953, being one of the newest craft in the PLA’s fleet, she pulled the firework barges for the Queen’s Coronation celebrations on the Thames." from: "Brent". National Historic Ships. Retrieved 15 August 2024.
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Gwent Broadcasting

Created by Dumelow (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 873 past nominations.

Dumelow (talk) 07:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Approved: Long enough, moved to mainspace within the window. Article is generally in good shape, well cited and neutral in tone. I have made some minor copyedits, and would advise clarification of the sentence She has a length of 65 feet (20 m), length overall of 73.61 feet (22.44 m) to be clear on the distinction between "length" and "length overall", for non-nautical readers. Images are appropriately licensed and I have no other concerns about copyvio, BLP or other serious policy issues. All hooks check out and I think are all good for the front page, at the promoting admin's discretion. QPQ is done. Good to go -- nice work. UndercoverClassicist ^T·C 09:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Yes, I meant to go back and add links to clarify the measurements, I have now done so - Dumelow (talk) 18:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

}}