Talk:Steve Gromek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Steve Gromek/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  14:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "Gromek was the winning pitcher in game four of the 1948 World Series with the Cleveland Indians" - this is a duplink
    "New Cleveland manager Lou Boudreau used Gromek as a relief pitcher in 1942" - this needs un-linking, already been linked
    "Gromek started the 1944 season in Cleveland's bullpen" - link bullpen for unfamiliar readers
    "Doby had just broken the color barrier in the American League a season earlier" - how did he break the color barrier earlier? Is it documented?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

This article is excellently written and meets the criteria as it is. I can't see any reason to leave it on hold. JAGUAR  18:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! Links are fixed, as for the Doby point, it's documented on his article big time, I didn't go into detail on Gromek's article though so as not to get too tangential, but if you think I should explain it a bit better I can go ahead and do that. Wizardman 18:20, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that! The colour barrier issue should be fine. JAGUAR  18:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]