Talk:Stronghold 2

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Emote (1 participant)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (3 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong!

This article is definitely not of neutral point of view. PC Gamer in the UK gave Stronghold 2 a good review, and many found he game to be good. I don't what the author of this article is on about. True there are many bugs. However, since no one really cares about this article, I don't think it would be worth asking someone to cite references here. Here, is where references are needed. Tourskin 23:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I agree. Though I am not a fan of the series or the game, I can't believe the "Critics" section. Its basically some fan boy saying how much he hates the game while assuming that everyone else feels this way. This article needs major NPOV revisions. PowderedToastMan 05:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read through the critics and technical problems. I think improvements have been made and it fits in NPOV now. Thus, I'm removing the NPOVD tag.Cocoma 22:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Detail

Does this article really need to go through all the characters in the game and all the units, what they cost etc? It seems like the article is way to sprawling, consists of lists and is just generally poorly written. 68.145.199.164 (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree, I was thinking that as I read through this too. I think that whole section can be removed. 206.116.184.155 (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i think that the game is cool and you guys are wrong, that page was very helpful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.237.71.83 (talk) 19:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is not Gamefaqs. If people want a guide to the game they can go there, but Wikipedia is not a game guide site. I agree, the article needs major clean-up Zell65 (talk) 08:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Try a table? Or delete it... The contents section is way overloaded. Zebas (talk) 00:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stronghold Wiki

I am editing a Stronghold 2 wiki and agree this is to much for the main page. I can cut some of the content and put it in the wiki with it own page and links to it on both Wikipedia and Wiki. Clubber-t (talk) 05:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference material

I found this: Play Magazine interview. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 03:53, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steam Edition

Last month ago. Firefly Studio rereleased Stronghold 2 into Stronghold 2: Steam Edition. Some section are outdated now. --AsyrafFile (talk) 04:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]