Talk:Sue Grey (lawyer)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New Zealand: Politics Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Name of Ngā Kaitiaki Tuku Iho Inc

From what I can establish online, there is a typo in the NZ Herald story used as the source for Grey's involvement in Grey the legal action by Ngā Kaitiaki Tuku Iho Inc - the group is referred to throughout the article as "Ngā Kaitiaki Tuku Ihu Inc". I'd like to correct the name in the body of this article, but then it wouldn't be supported by the source cited. We can't just swap it out with another article, because other articles that get the group's name correct don't mention Grey, so the Herald article is required. Could we add a second citation to the sentence "Grey was part of a legal action by the group Ngā Kaitiaki Tuku Ihu Inc against Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, the Minister of Health, the director-general of health and others in the High Court"? The best one I can find is the decision from the High Court^[1], and I'm not sure how acceptable that is as a source (I'm hoping it's at least acceptable as a sort of 'supporting citation'). Hazel dirty-blonde hair (talk) 19:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds good to me; perhaps fix the typo and use that ref right after the name, as a citation that just supports that. I'm taking a wee break from this article, time for other people to have a turn! —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 09:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ [2021] NZHC 1107.

Section Investigation by Law Society

This section has the investigation by the Law Society, what she has claimed on social media and how long she was banned. Maybe the section title should be renamed? Danielryan0 (talk) 02:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022?

The article currently reads: In February 2022 she was banned for 30 days. In October a formal complaint was laid against Grey with the New Zealand Law Society Yesterday, I added "2021" after October to clarify that we aren't talking about October 2022; this is what the sentence structure would suggest. HenryCrun15, you removed "2021" in your latest edit. Is there a good reason to do so that I cannot see? If there isn't, would you mind putting the year back? Schwede 66 21:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've put it back. --Pokelova (talk) 23:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [2021] NZHC 1107.

[1]