This article was nominated for deletion on 7 September 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
To whom it may concern - editors.
A respectful request, please, regarding my privacy and my and my family's safety, even.
I reference WP:BLPPRIVACY
Suede deBronkart here, a.k.a. Suede. I am an entertainer who goes by my middle name, Suede - single name only. I've asked several times here (and elsewhere) to please help me maintain some degree of privacy by not publishing my birth name. I've had fanatic fans cause me to file restraining orders and have had to hire security because they've tracked my home and my 92 year old mother's home down by finding my birth name. Anywhere I happen to see it published I try to remove it. That's all. No editing war intended. I appreciate your support on this detail. I respectfully make that request, please - do not publish my birth name on the page about my professional life as Suede.
Thank you Suedewave (talk) 20:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
4meter4, you pointed to WP:BLPPRIVACY which describes what to do if the birth date is considered private, but the guideline does not say anything about what steps to take if the subject's birth name is considered private—it does not offer a solution at all, let alone for cases such as this with a well-known birth name. Suede's birth name has been widely published since 1994. So WP:BLPPRIVACY does not support your position. Binksternet (talk) 22:22, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In this case we have the subject objecting to the content citing that their personal safety and the safety of their family is at risk. In my opinion, that’s enough to justify invoking this policy. If the name is put back I will go to WP:ANI. ANI may not agree, but I suspect they will.4meter4 (talk) 22:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is one solution. Or we could semi-protect it and put a hidden note in to not add her birth name. There are multiple workable solutions.4meter4 (talk) 16:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If someone is famous enough for a Wikipedia article, they are famous enough to have their birth name shown, when supported by multiple major sources as in this case. Pawnkingthree is correct that deletion is the solution if they don't like their birth name shown. Binksternet (talk) 17:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Binksternet} has removed the hidden note to prevent editing of the name. In my opinion, this is a bad faith edit that potentially has real world negative and dangerous consequences to the subject. Binksternet, can you please justify why you think this hidden note is somehow not a workable solution? It seems to me safety and privacy concerns trump all other considerations, particularly since the subject's actual name is not typically used in most references on the subject or in promotional materials. There really doesn't seem to be an encyclopedic necessity for including the name, and the responsible thing to do would be to protect the safety of a living person and her family.4meter4 (talk) 21:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]