Talk:Surprise (song)
Appearance
A fact from Surprise (song) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 September 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 21:22, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that "Surprise'" by Chloe Bailey was hand-picked to be released by Beyoncé, from a batch of three songs? Source: Vibe
Created by VersaceSpace (talk). Self-nominated at 05:14, 7 August 2022 (UTC).
- Interesting song and picking history, on fine sources, no copyvio obvious. I'd like to see in a hook that she originally asked her the public to pick, but that's perhaps hard to word in short. I have a few concerns regarding the article:
- It's borderline in length. Could you expand a bit, the lead, the reception, the description? To be not in danger of it being too short when only one word is cut.
- I don't know what inside a mind would mean, vs. in a mind (unless the length thingy mentioned above).
- Reading she is pictured without a shirt lets me imagine in pants without a shirt. Better say that only her upper body is pictured, lying on her belly (or however to express that you won't see her breast), with no clothes. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt:, thank you for your suggestions. I've tried to tend to them. I've added to the lead a bit which I think pushes it more over the line. I'm a bit lazy right now, which is why I didn't peruse any sources to look for more content. Full transparency :) —VersaceSpace 🌃 02:19, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- fine with me --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:17, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt:, thank you for your suggestions. I've tried to tend to them. I've added to the lead a bit which I think pushes it more over the line. I'm a bit lazy right now, which is why I didn't peruse any sources to look for more content. Full transparency :) —VersaceSpace 🌃 02:19, 9 August 2022 (UTC)