Talk:Syzygium apodophyllum

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Australia: Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Syzygium apodophyllum is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Link to bush tucker and also bushfood?

I suggest including a link to the "bush tucker" page under "See Also" and also add it to the "bush tucker" page itself.

May I also suggest adding a link at the bottom to the bushfood page (category:bushfood.)

While I don't have the original book to which it is referenced in regard to the fruit being "edible," (3) I was able to find some pages online to the revamped book by the same authors and note that in one of the front pages, it very clearly stated that while birds and animals may be able to eat some of the fruit from the trees and plants mentioned in the book, that doesn't mean that they're safe for human beings to consume. May I suggest that the original person who noted that its fruit is edible, actually verify that it's safe for human beings to consume and not just birds/animals, otherwise it may lead to someone being poisoned or worse. If it's not able to be verified, then I strongly urge that the reference to its fruit being "edible" should be removed..

Note: I've tried to do the links, but don't understand enough to do that.

Tzali (talk) 08:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]