This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more non-binary people. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Many, but not all, non-binary people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBTQ+ WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.
Hi Helper201: I changed the photo from Tamsin Omond (left) - 2011 - Railway Adventure (pic 8) (cropped).jpg to Tamsin Omond (centre) - 2009 (cropped).jpg because whilst it's slightly older (from 2009 instead of 2011), it is much better lit and it's much easier to see Omond's face. I think it's also a better photo in general better suited to an encyclopedia. I hope that their new level of profile means we can have a better and up-to-date photo of them but of what's available on the Commons, I think the 2009 image is the one to go for! Ralbegen (talk) 09:55, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ralbegen, I personally think the 2011 photo is better and its of course more recent. I like that it’s more of a full body shot and there's no one else in the photo. I have uploaded all the good quality photos of them I could find available on Flickr to Wikimedia Commons that had the appropriate copyright to upload. If you could find and upload more recent images then we could use them here. Maybe try asking them directly, such as via social media (I don't use it myself)? Hopefully they could provide you with a good quality and more recent photo and permission to upload it; perhaps one as part of their current election campaign. Helper201 (talk) 10:04, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work getting photos of them from Flickr! I think a 3:4 head-and-shoulders portrait is usually the right choice for a biographical article's main subject so for that and the lighting reasons cited above I'm afraid I'm not convinced; but I'm happy to leave the status quo until we have an up-to-date image or until more editors participate to form a winder consensus. I don't think I'll be able to reach out to Omond to seek a better image but often election candidates' teams seem to put suitable photos on the Commons before too long! Ralbegen (talk) 11:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]