Talk:Team One (advertising agency)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

PenaCynthia (talk · contribs) has been paid by Team One. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Declaration

Starting article

I just began this article for Team One, which is a major advertising firm with substantial coverage in the independent press. I work for Team One, and I recognize that my conflict of interest means I will need independent review to ensure the article reflects Wikipedia's neutral point of view. I have done my best to do so, but am seeking other perspectives to confirm or adjust the text. -PenaCynthia (talk) 21:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In response to an edit made by James Allison - Because Team One is a division of Saatchi and Saatchi and both are under Publicis Groupe, which is Public, Team One is a Public Company as well. I will look for a source that clearly establishes this.

PenaCynthia (talk) 18:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A banner was recently placed on the article indicating that "a major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." This is true, as I posted above; but I am interested to know what concerns there are about neutral point of view. As I described above and in my several requests for review at relevant WikiProjects, I have worked to maintain NPOV throughout my work here, and would like to address any problems I may have introduced inadvertently.

When I made this request in Feb. 2016, Sanket Edits Wiki reviewed the article and found no problems. They directed me to this advice, which I have reviewed and makes sense. But they did not find problems. I did add new sections since the version they reviewed; my more recent requests for feedback have not gotten any response. Are there problems with those additions? -PenaCynthia (talk) 21:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have followed the procedure for dealing with a conflict of interest, but it should not be you who decides when or if the tag gets removed from the article. I'd suggest you leave a message at the COI noticeboard, or contact one of the editors who have previously helped you. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Banner was replaced with proper banner Connected contributor since the editor in question, PenaCynthia works for the agency. Geejayen (talk) 23:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]