Talk:Teichoscopy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Teichoscopy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

What is it?[edit]

The article needs to say "What It Is", for people who have never heard of it. For instance, does it mean an actor standing on a balcony and pretending to observe a far-off event? - or is it something else? Bards 09:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I should have thought it obvious who was doing the observing: members of the cast of course. Anyway, have copy-edited intro para now. Dieter Simon 00:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was obvious who was doing the observing, but not what they were doing, or how, or where from. Am I right in thinking that the far-off events are never actually seen by the audience - or are they sometimes depicted aswell, eg. in miniature or on a projection? Bards 06:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have now refined who it is who uses teichoscopy in the play to achieve the playwright's intentions, Bardsandwarriors:

"Teichoscopy, in Theatre, is the "Viewing from a Wall", or from a balcony or window, when characters in the play observe from within the relatively confined space of the stage far-off happenings, such as armies massing in war or actual battles taking place, and in this way are witnessing the progress of the drama unfolding and in the dialogue are describing to others what they see."

Yes, it is the players who are looking on the "armies massing in war or actual battles taking place..." It was there all the time, the armies and the battles (in the distance). That can't really be achieved on the stage, can it? Just imagine Helen of Troy standing on the battlements of the ramparts, shielding her eyes against the sun and explaining to Priam (I think) what is going on in the distance, that they are just getting ready to do battle. (He couldn't see, nor can the audience).

Dieter Simon 00:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Dieter Simon 00:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Dieter. It was a genuine question, for my genuine misunderstanding. Would you mind if I edit it a bit more, for clarity? You can revert my edits if you don't like them. Bards 07:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free, Bardsanwarriors, we Wikipedians are all in the same boat, we can edit one another's edits. Dieter Simon 22:51, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Hope you like it. It seems clearer now :) Bards

Yes thanks, it looks fine. Dieter Simon 00:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger with teichoscopia[edit]

The discussion on the proposal to merge the article is here. DionysosProteus (talk) 12:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion page on "teichoscopia" has been going on for a long time now, and the only voices seem to be in favour of merging teichoscopia into teichoscopy. Have changed the prompt in teichoscopy to changing from teichoscopia to teichoscopy. Dieter Simon (talk) 18:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger completed[edit]

Text and/or other creative content from Teichoscopia was copied or moved into Teichoscopy with [permanent diff this edit]. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Dieter Simon (talk) 00:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Dieter Simon (talk)[reply]