Talk:Texas Advance Directives Act

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Mid-importance).

Discussion From Futile Care Law

Primarily I added the NPOV tag because of the lack of references -- in particular, the statement that someone was forced to die "against her wishes" could be construed as biased unless there is a reference to it (say, in a news article) and the reference is cited in this article. Not a bad article, in general, but it could use some expansion. -- MatthewDBA 17:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After merging, I cleaned up the text to make it less biased and added "Cases" and "Criticism" so the controversy is easier to follow. Ksargent 21:10, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References

I just added oodles of references.

Well, maybe not oodles, but at least an oodle and a smidgen.

I hope that helps.

If nobody else addresses it, I'll flesh it out some more later.

NiftyDude 17:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with "Advance Directives Act"?

Seems to me that this article is about the same the the "Advance Directives Act" is about. At the very least I think there should be a link to that article for the words "The Futile Care Law" since that article actually explains what the law is. 192.52.57.33 16:51, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This fits well with the Advance Directives Act and so I merged it unchanged. Ksargent 19:50, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Clark Case

Has anyone here heard about the Andrea Clark case? There are a couple articles on it in the Houston Chronicle, here and here. More can be found with a quick google search.

Oops, Forgot to sign in, and to leave my sig Linguofreak 19:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

other advance directives law

Hi. The most prominent and I think initial law was passed in California. Should that be mentioned in here, along with other states? Don't think we need a different article for each state law, right? HG 15:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

broken link

Fixed broken link to bill text. First edit, so saying something in case I made a mistake. The Texas legislature page has apparently undergone a recent update, which included moving all the bill text pages. Randomundergrad

Requested move 10 March 2014

The request to rename this article to Texas Advance Directives Act has been carried out.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Advance Directives Act → Texas Advance Directives Act – This page is a redir. from Texas Futile Care Law. This is a state-specific/Texas topic. --Relisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC) 24.0.133.234 (talk) 15:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support (I am editor who proposed move)24.0.133.234 (talk) 23:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Other Cases

The other cases section needs to be revised as the reference it links to no longer exists and may not be accurate. The current reference links to http://www.texaslawyer.com/id=1172829796788 which no longer exists. The section of the wikipedia article currently claims that across ~16 or so hospitals, there were 974 medical futility consultations with only 65 letters in agreement.

In the article "Fine RL, Mayo TW. Resolution of futility by due process: early experience with the Texas advance directives. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:743-6." Fine states that during a two year period in just the Baylor Healthcare System, there were 43 letters in agreement. It seems like an odd mismatch that out of the total 65 letters in agreement, 43 were in one hospital system.

Yoosc 14:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An appropriate article "Fine RL. Point: The Texas Advance Directives Act Effectively and Ethically Resolves Disputes About Medical Futility. Chest 2009 136(4):963-7." discusses the previously mentioned statistics.

Yoosc 14:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]