This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Addition of image of an unidentified street in Sri Lanka
@~AntanO4task: The text looks much better now that you have rewritten it to be less garbled, and also providing it with a reference. As for the image that you also added to the article, this should still be removed per MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE which states: "Poor-quality images—dark or blurry; showing the subject too small, hidden in clutter, or ambiguous; and so on—should not be used." The subject here is Thai massage. One has to first open the image, and then zoom in to even see that the sign on the building is advertising a spa. Only after zooming in even further, can one see in tiny letters the word "Thai" above the word "Spa". In other words, the subject is too small and should therefore be removed per Wikipedia policy which I did and now am forced to do again. If you feel that this is still in error, please state your case here on the talkpage instead of reverting my edits again. - Takeaway (talk) 16:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
You reverted first by saying "unnecessary image", now switched to MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE, and "unidentified street". What's your point? People like you wanna control some articles and bark at others by some "rationalizations", and it is waste of time to explain. --~AntanO4task (talk) 22:11, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
It was unnecessary due to the fact that it mainly illustrated a street in Sri Lanka and its only relation to this article being a small sign with on it "Thai Spa". It was unnecessary to have it added to this article. Please state why you think it is necessary to be included instead of venting your anger at me. - Takeaway (talk) 22:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)