Talk:The Elegant Universe

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Publications Taskforce.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

User friendly!

I have read part of this book: it's very clear and easy to understand (from a layman's point of view). I think we should add something about its readability and superb writing style. This is just an idea; I'll come back with more thoughts when I finish the book. Wikiisawesome 11:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first section of the book, which covers the first chapter, is extremely informative, and opens up new theories which I am interested in exploring. I will put more here as I complete the book. TrekCaptainUSA (talk) 16:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia Section

I suggest deleting the Trivia section. The reference to the movie has no real significance to the article. Master Shake 9 21:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead, WP:TRIVIA encourages it. --Closedmouth 11:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pretty TV special

revolutionarily pretty TV special, ever since all science documentaries have more polished illustrative graphics —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.10.105.239 (talk) 07:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TheElegantUniverse.jpg

Image:TheElegantUniverse.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Funding

Does anyone have any idea what the Funding section is referring to?  It's just a list of organisations, I gather they gave some money to someone for something but what?  Did they advertise in the TV show?  That doesn't seem notable. 58.96.94.12 (talk) 08:27, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Errata

The Errata section seems incredibly unimportant, and too long even if it does belong. The minor details of the birth of Polish physicists doesn't seem to be relevant to the book as a whole, I'd say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.220.252.12 (talk) 01:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. OriumX (talk) 01:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and removed that section. If someone disagrees please discuss it here. OriumX (talk) 01:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]