Talk:The Pill Versus the Springhill Mine Disaster
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Requested move 05 September 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: NOT MOVED (request withdrawn) (non-admin closure) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
The Pill Versus the Springhill Mine Disaster → The Pill versus the Springhill Mine Disaster – Redirect in the way. The title of the book uses a lowercase v. Thanks. – — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites: Obey book author's choice or obey Wikipedia rules? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose – The book is published with capitalized "Versus" on the spine (see image). There's no indication that the author had a preference one way or another. I think that MOS:CT suggests caps here, so let's do. Dicklyon (talk) 05:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn - My mistake. I was looking at a couple versions that do use lowercase, but others certainly don't, and I have no reason to believe Brautigan preferred one or the other. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
- @Anthony Appleyard: As I don't think I've had cause to close a move request before, would you mind confirming for me that I've done so correctly? Thanks. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites: Looks all right to me. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Anthony Appleyard: Great. Thanks for your help. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)