Talk:The Rookie: Feds

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Draft notice

This is a notice that there is a draft for The Rookie and The Rookie: Feds crossover at Draft:The Rookie and The Rookie: Feds crossover until such a time that it is ready for inclusion in the mainspace. All are welcome to come help nurture the article's development there. TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improve "Reception" part discussion

17% Audience score on rotten tomatoes. I think that just giving 86% percent critics score (based on 7 Reviews) will give reader false assumptions regarding the real perception by the public, should we do better? Qwnick (talk) 19:07, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Completely agree. I have watched a number of episodes but I couldn't watch anymore. The audience score really reflects the quality of this show and I believe it should be added to the article. 82.197.182.82 (talk) 19:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree. I couldn't even make it through the first episode. It came across as a parody/comedy and a slap in the face to its parent show. And, as of this writing, it has not yet been renewed for a second season. 2600:8800:395:B000:E860:1C9C:F84C:9F77 (talk) 08:00, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree as well that mentioning only the critics score would be way too misleading, so I added the audience rating and audience score from Rotten Tomatoes. The current Audience Rating of 18% and an average audience score of 1.7/5 are quite bad, but sometimes, it just is what it is and one has to live with it. --Whisker (talk) 22:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User-generated scores/ratings are considered to be unreliable sources on Wikipedia, please see WP:UGC and MOS:TVRECEPTION. Audience ratings/reviews are allowed only when they are discussed by reliable sources, audience ratings/reviews are not allowed when they are directly from IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes audience ratings/reviews, or Metacritic user scores themselves. — YoungForever^(talk) 23:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to familiarize with WP:BRD. When you make a bold edit, and that edit is reverted by another editor, the status quo should remain in place while you begin seeking a consensus on the talk page. In other words, you shouldn't make an additional revert to your preferred version while the discussion is occurring. I labeled the revert as a "good faith" edit, because I figured you may not be aware of WP:UCG/MOS:TVRECEPTION. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]