Talk:The Scandal of Scientology

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Scandal of Scientology article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Scientology High‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arbitrary section header

Terryeo and Justanother must not be aware of this page yet... Talk page is empty... How positively boring.John 19:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Rundown Truth: Scientology Changes Strategy in War with Media

Urban, Hugh B. (March 17, 2010). "The Rundown Truth: Scientology Changes Strategy in War with Media". Religion Dispatches. www.religiondispatches.org. Retrieved 2010-03-18.

Hugh B. Urban is a professor of religious studies at Ohio State University. This article is a good source of info on multiple topics. -- Cirt (talk) 19:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Twelve years later, there is still no synopsis! (Or, has there been one which was later excised? Arrivisto (talk) 11:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So...What Is the Book About?

I see sections in the article concerning the controversy, but no synopsis of the book itself?

Williamskidfears (talk) 01:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Twelve years later, these is STILL NO SYNOPSIS!! (Or, has a synopsis been posted and then scandalously excised?)

This is a good point; the article seems more about the response to the book than the book itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.192.29 (talk) 04:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The book itself is online free at this link:

https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Fishman/cooper-scandal.txt — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:4300:EE90:C418:35:B618:F60 (talk) 01:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The book is available from several sources. They are listed at The Scandal of Scientology § External links. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 02:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weird spam

This spam was posted on the main page of this article and I have removed it. I am not a scienctolagost but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be there. Here is the rude spam exatley as it appered, spelling mistakes intact, "There was many slaves and they have been known to do eachother at nigjht in the bum ;)" From Whata. 109.77.17.67 (talk) 17:47, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Scandal of Scientology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]