This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from The Sleeping Beauty Quartet appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 October 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
Since this appears to be an article about the trilogy, I have modifed the last line to indicate that the (IMHO excellent) existing summary only covers the first book. Ideally the original summariser will continue. If not I may be forced to try.
Shannock910:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The intro says "The trilogy was a bestseller, outearning Interview with the Vampire.[1]". ie. that 3 books outsold a single book. Is that really a meaningful comparison to make? --203.33.167.161 (talk) 09:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say yes. Interview was a top scale movie starring Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, Christopher Slater, Kirsten Dunst and Antonio Bandaras. To say that 3 books of an erotic nature together sold more than a book with a movie of that caliber seems quite notable to me. -- 66.192.28.122 (talk) 20:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It may be an issue of wording as well. the vampire chronicles were also a large set that is often referred to by the name of the first bookJgeddis (talk) 11:17, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Since the article is about the trilogy as a whole and not the first book in the series, I think the aricle should be moved. Agree? Disagree? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.240.60.242 (talk) 09:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can never figure out how to edit the article and can barely post here, but someone who knows how might wish to add that, in addition to the original audiocassette release of the trilogy narrated by Amy Brenneman and Elizabeth Montgomery, released in 1994 by Simon & Schuster, there was also a later audio release of the trilogy from Harper Collins all narrated by Genvieve Bevier and Winthrop Eliot, I believe in 2004. Could someone, perhaps BorgQueen, fix this? Thanks! Hope I did this right.
MusicalMan77 (talk) 03:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)MusicalMan77
Edit: Whoops! My bad. It IS mentioned briefly as a one-liner but not the date nor publisher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MusicalMan77 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
