Talk:Thomas Norton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article needs some expert attention[edit]

The disclaimer in the opening sentence - to the effect that Norton wasn't Elizabeth's chief interrogator - seems to reflect more recent scholarship (see, e.g. Norton's entry in the ODNB), but the body of the page reflects an earlier & different consensus. Dsp13 (talk) 20:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]